Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove duplicate ECF variables #31213

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 29, 2020
Merged

Conversation

ahinzmann
Copy link
Contributor

@ahinzmann ahinzmann commented Aug 24, 2020

PR description:

Resolve #31052.
Remove duplicate N2 and N3 variables from MiniAOD.

The duplicate was kept before for backward compatibility with the TWiki (https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/WorkBookMiniAOD2017#Jets).
The TWiki needs to be updated with this change.

Before this PR, for all AK8 jets with pT<250 GeV 4 values -99999.0 were stored in MiniAOD and NanoAOD. After this PR, those dummy values are not stored anymore MiniAOD, and only kept in NanoAOD for 170<pT<250.

@rappoccio Please check that the code diff makes sense, since you wrote this.

PR validation:

scram b runtests

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

No backport planned.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good, I approved them.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31213/17862

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

  • There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ahinzmann for master.

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/NanoAOD
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos

@perrotta, @gouskos, @cmsbuild, @fgolf, @slava77, @jpata, @mariadalfonso, @santocch, @peruzzim can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @gouskos, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @smoortga, @riga, @schoef, @mmarionncern, @peruzzim, @jdamgov, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @clelange, @emilbols, @hatakeyamak, @ferencek, @gpetruc, @andrzejnovak, @mariadalfonso, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 24, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 330f12c

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-24-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-370b92/8883/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests RelVals

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test runtestPhysicsToolsNanoAOD had ERRORS

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
1325.7 step2

runTheMatrix-results/1325.7_TTbar_13_94Xv2NanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94Xv2NanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017_94XMiniAODv2+HARVESTNANOAODMC2017_94XMiniAODv2/step2_TTbar_13_94Xv2NanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94Xv2NanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017_94XMiniAODv2+HARVESTNANOAODMC2017_94XMiniAODv2.log

25202.0 step5
runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+NANOUP15_PU25/step5_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+NANOUP15_PU25.log

10824.0 step6
runTheMatrix-results/10824.0_TTbar_13+2018+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSim+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA+Nano/step6_TTbar_13+2018+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSim+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA+Nano.log

10224.0 step5
runTheMatrix-results/10224.0_TTbar_13+2017PU+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSim+DigiPU+RecoPU+HARVESTPU+Nano/step5_TTbar_13+2017PU+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSim+DigiPU+RecoPU+HARVESTPU+Nano.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@santocch
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Aug 29, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit c608f77 into cms-sw:master Aug 29, 2020
@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

This appears to have broken workflows 136.7722 and 1329.1 in the IBs.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

please test workflow 136.7722, 1329.1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 30, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Test Parameters:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: c1494d0

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-30-0000
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-370b92/9006/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
136.7722 step2

runTheMatrix-results/136.7722_RunJetHT2016H_nano+RunJetHT2016H_nano+NANOEDM2016_80X+HARVESTNANOAOD2016_80X/step2_RunJetHT2016H_nano+RunJetHT2016H_nano+NANOEDM2016_80X+HARVESTNANOAOD2016_80X.log

1329.1 step2
runTheMatrix-results/1329.1_ZEE_13_80XNanoAODINPUT+ZEE_13_80XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2016_80X+HARVESTNANOAODMC2016_80X/step2_ZEE_13_80XNanoAODINPUT+ZEE_13_80XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2016_80X+HARVESTNANOAODMC2016_80X.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

@ahinzmann

the 136.722 and 1329.1 are mini of a type 'run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy'

we should add 'run2_nanoAOD_92X' 'run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy' in the list here
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/31213/files#diff-8255cc2b641b6438258bddebcd7425efR473

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

repeated AK8PuppiSoftDrop ecfN data in slimmedJetsAK8
10 participants